![]() ![]() SWS is partnering with Candian company eCamion Inc. “And hopefully the results of this test will validate technology that has benefits across the state and Circumpolar North." Anchorage gets to demonstrate innovation and prove sustainability," Mayor Ethan Berkowitz said. SWS currently operates a fleet of 70 vehicles, including 22 garbage trucks. Department of Energy awarded the municipal government’s Department of Solid Waste Services (SWS) a $689,659 grant to help fund the city’s first EV trucks and battery charging infrastructure. It used federal grant money to purchase a Peterbilt 520EV refuse truck and a medium-duty Peterbilt 220EV box truck that will be delivered next year. ![]() The city of Anchorage, Alaska, is one of those customers. Paccar expects to start delivering battery-electric trucks to more customers in 2021, the company announced this summer. “Medium-term demand for zero-emissions vehicles will be primarily in refuse, port and local delivery applications which do not require long-distance travel or a network of refueling infrastructure, as well as in locations with government-mandated zero emissions.” “Industry zero-emissions powertrain deliveries are expected to be modest over the next several years due to the high cost of the technology,” according to Kyle Quinn, Paccar chief technology officer. Paccar - which along with U.S.-based brands Kenworth and Peterbilt, includes the Netherlands-based DAF - now has more than 60 battery-electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid trucks being tested in real-world applications in North America and Europe. Paccar technical centers are providing extensive performance testing. Shell provided hydrogen fuel and infrastructure for the project. ![]() The trucks, produced at the Kenworth factory in Renton, Wash., integrate Toyota fuel cell technology into the T680. The biggest delivery from the company came from its Kenworth brand, which recently provided more zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell Kenworth T680 trucks for customers at the Port of Los Angeles for field testing, Paccar announced. Paccar is ramping up the real-world testing of its zero-emission trucks as it prepares to produce more alternative fuel vehicles for customers in 2021. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() There was a time when GPS on smartwatches was nothing short of a unicorn. Plus, you aren’t going to stare at the screen all the time, so this had better not be active. But you want to turn that off unless you aren’t bothered about why Fitbit battery drains fast. ![]() The display on both watches is always on. Versa 2 displays quality images at 300 pixels and improvements made on Versa 3 increased pixel value by 36 to 336 pixels. And the inclusion of Gorilla 3 is a clear indicator that you’re putting you money on a wearable that can survive accidental falls.īoth smartwatches have colored display, but the image quality differ albeit by small margin. The screen real estate of both smartwatches feel smooth to touch and offers a much better touch and swipe experience than older models. It has a 1.58-inch AMOLED display, which is 0.28 inches more the size of Versa 2. There is an instantly noticeable difference in display size between Fitbit Versa 2 and Versa 3.įrom where I sit, the Versa 3 appeals to an audience that waited for Fitbit to unveil an update with a bigger screen in the Versa series. However, do keep in mind that the more you get in water with either watches the faster the water-resistance wear out. ![]() That value means both watches can go as deep as 50 meters in water and stand up to that much pressure underneath. And Versa 2 and 3 are examples of models that have a 5 ATM rating. In my Fitbit and Apple Watch comparison, I stated that both brands design watches that can withstand water pressure to certain degrees. And if you wish to switch them for a more personalized pair, you’re welcome to do that. Made out of durable, pliable, hypoallergenic elastomer, the bands of both devices feel smooth and comfortable. And while the difference in weight isn’t as big, I’d recommend going for Versa 3 if you need a lighter smartwatch. Versa 2 and 3 weigh 40 grams and 30 grams respectively. Obviously, the difference in dimension is menial and hardly ever noticeable even from a close distance. To begin with, Versa 2 is 40mm by 40mm while Versa 3 is 40.44mm by 40.4mm. These two models are just hard not to love. And the Versa 2 and 3 is a clear emblem of how well change in time can make a brand switch from a boring look to an appealing aesthetic. Undoubtedly, Fitbit Versa 2 and Versa 3 are a cream of the crop in the brand’s wearable timeline.īoth have features that overlap and differences that set them apart.įitbit’s approach to design has revolutionized over time. ![]() Charging Time 2 hours 2 to 3 hours Battery Life Up to 5 days on smartwatch mode on a single full charge Up to 6 days on smartwatch mode on a single full charge Check Latest Price Check Latest Price Fitbit Versa 2 vs Fitbit Versa 3: Differences Explained Sleep, calories burned, pace, steps taken, distances covered. The table is a summary of my findings on the comparison between Fitbit Versa 3 and Fitbit Versa 3: Fitbit Versa 2 Fitbit Versa 3 Display 1.3-inches Gorilla Glass 3 AMOLED always on screen 1.58-inches Gorilla Glass 3 AMOLED always on screen Operating Temperature -10☌ minimum and 60☌ maximum -20☌ minimum and 60☌ maximum Bands Replaceable bands made of silicone Replaceable bands made of polyester and silicone GPS Connected GPS GPS + GLONASS Water Resistance Up to 5 ATM Up to 5 ATM Calls Not available Receives call alerts Activities Sleep, calories burned, pace, steps taken, distances covered. Fitbit Versa 2 vs Fitbit Versa 3 Specs Comparison So in this Fitbit Versa 2 vs Fitbit Versa 3 guide, I do a complete side-by-side comparison of the two models to help you make an informed choice on what to buy. ![]() But it’s only until you look deeper that you unearth the differences that tell them apart. On the surface, Fitbit Versa 2 and Versa 3 look so good that you would most likely want to have them both. ![]() |